PDA

View Full Version : Did I miss play this hand

ha0dho
23-11-2009, 07:45 PM
PokerStars Game #35750146614: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25 USD) - 2009/11/23 19:19:48 WET [2009/11/23 14:19:48 ET]
Table 'Irpedina V' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: nicosuper ($7.05 in chips)
Seat 2: DeadEndKev ($25.35 in chips)
Seat 3: Combsy53 ($4.65 in chips)
Seat 4: RNK315 ($14.75 in chips)
Seat 5: Peter Panzen ($2.50 in chips)
Seat 7: chendidi ($5.15 in chips)
Seat 8: 3toppari ($7.05 in chips)
Seat 9: forex trder ($16.35 in chips)
RNK315: posts small blind $0.10
Peter Panzen: posts big blind $0.25
WaiT4U: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to forex trder [:Ad::Qc:]
chendidi: folds
3toppari: raises $0.75 to $1
forex trder: calls $1
nicosuper: folds
DeadEndKev: folds
Combsy53: folds
RNK315: folds
Peter Panzen: folds
*** FLOP *** [:Js::As::Tc:]
3toppari: bets $1
forex trder: calls $1
*** TURN *** [:Js::As::Tc:] [:Qd:]
3toppari: checks
forex trder: checks
*** RIVER *** [[:Js::As::Tc::Qd:] [:8c:]
3toppari: bets $2.50
forex trder: calls $2.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
3toppari: shows [:Th::5h:] (a pair of Tens)
forex trder: shows [:Ad::Qc:] (two pair, Aces and Queens)
forex trder collected $8.90 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $9.35 | Rake $0.45
Board [:Js::As::Tc::Qd::8c:]
Seat 1: nicosuper folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: DeadEndKev folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Combsy53 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: RNK315 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Peter Panzen (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: chendidi folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: 3toppari showed [:Th::5h:] and lost with a pair of Tens
Seat 9: forex trder showed [:Ad::Qc:] and won ($8.90) with two pair, Aces and Queens

What you guys think; Im not sure if I played this hand right looking back I feel I got lucky by the fact that the other guy played rubbish cards on the flop there was loads of hands that had me beat that this guy could have and even though the turn gave me two pair it also completed a striaght.
Phlmc
23-11-2009, 07:47 PM
not really; bit of a limp way to play it
ha0dho
23-11-2009, 08:32 PM
not really; bit of a limp way to play it

Probably true looking back over the stats that guy had played nearly 70% of all hands so maybe I should not have given him credit for a big hand.
pads1161
23-11-2009, 09:52 PM
I think you play it ok I guess.

One thing though your game seleciton is so bad. Game selection is so important at these stakes, you need to be on tables with people with 100+bbs imo. I notice you dont have auto top up either, why is this?
Phlmc
23-11-2009, 09:56 PM
I think you play it ok I guess.

One thing though your game seleciton is so bad. Game selection is so important at these stakes, you need to be on tables with people with 100+bbs imo. I notice you dont have auto top up either, why is this?


looks standard type at that lvl to be fair

noone has full buyin; all ppl trying to roll up; one time; ty; wp; ul; gg; etc
pads1161
23-11-2009, 10:16 PM
looks standard type at that lvl to be fair

noone has full buyin; all ppl trying to roll up; one time; ty; wp; ul; gg; etc

na theres tonnes of tables with full stacks, if not just go to the 50bb min tables.
Phlmc
23-11-2009, 10:17 PM
na theres tonnes of tables with full stacks, if not just go to the 50bb min tables.

why just buyin min and roll up
Frisby
23-11-2009, 10:46 PM
I don't think you played it that bad at all. The call on the river is standard as a ship is a massive spew. I don't mind the check back on the turn or the flat on the flop.

Only thing I may do is 3bet to isolate preflop to like 2.50 since as you say villain is playing so many hands and you have a monster vs his range.
Lionrock
02-12-2009, 04:24 PM
I think u just have to raise his flop bet.
draw heavy board and already behind to AJ / AT / JT - all very possible.
need to find out where u are here as turn card has every chance to making it even harder to assess.
if he isn't that strong a flop raise (even a small one) could easily buy u a check on the turn.
as played check behind on the turn makes sense and river call looks easy given stats etc.
Mullet
02-12-2009, 04:33 PM
3 bet pre and take control of the hand
Scotty
02-12-2009, 04:48 PM
3 bet pre and take control of the hand

I'm 3betting with AQ 100% of the time against somebody with 70% VPIP. Partly for value, but mostly because I want to isolate him and thin the field. You should be happy to play big pots in position against this type of player with AQ.

As played, I guess it worked out quite well. I would probably raise the flop, but once you've just called the flop there's no other option but to c/c the turn and river. Easy call on the river btw, depite the 4 cards to a straight.
FarmerDave
02-12-2009, 05:54 PM
I'm 3betting with AQ 100% of the time against somebody with 70% VPIP. Partly for value, but mostly because I want to isolate him and thin the field. You should be happy to play big pots in position against this type of player with AQ.

As played, I guess it worked out quite well. I would probably raise the flop, but once you've just called the flop there's no other option but to c/c the turn and river. Easy call on the river btw, depite the 4 cards to a straight.

+1, i would have done the same
avkid
02-12-2009, 05:55 PM
+1, i would have done the same

lies. pretty sure u wud have shoved pre as AQ is the nuts
FarmerDave
02-12-2009, 05:57 PM
lies. pretty sure u wud have shoved pre as AQ is the nuts

+1, i would have done this, :rolleyes:
Frisby
02-12-2009, 06:58 PM
I like a 3bet pre to isolate (and get it in if he shoves or 4bets IMO) I also like a smallish bet on the turn after he checks to you, something like $2.50, again getting it in here if he shoves. As played call river.

FWIW I don't think you played it bad, just I would play it slightly differently.